Insurance company poised to drop Canyon County’s coverage | Body & More

NAMPA, Idaho (AP) — An insurance policy business that addresses counties and other general public entities in Idaho claims it will not likely renew Canyon County’s coverage plan because of raising dangers and a large quantity of promises.

The Idaho Counties Risk Management System, identified as ICRMP, sent a letter to Canyon County officials on May 23, citing “numerous aspects including adverse declare growth and increasing risk exposures,” the Idaho Press described. The Nampa-based mostly newspaper obtained the document by public information requests.

Canyon County Public Info Officer Joe Decker stated the county’s elected officials couldn’t instantly remark because the circumstance is onging.

“We are performing to appraise all choices, which include likely renewal with ICRMP and the likely acquisition of substitution protection,” Decker wrote in an e mail. “More facts will be forthcoming when accessible.”

Canyon County Commissioners responded to ICRMP in a June 2 letter that prompt the county could possibly appeal the non-renewal see. They took difficulty with the non-renewal final decision, indicating, “the abruptness and comprehensiveness of this full separation, and the absence of warning or chance to get rid of any perceived concern, is shocking.”

The commissioners also explained the insurance policies company’s documentation displaying the county’s “loss history” was not correct. They claimed 25 of the promises shown are “unrelated to the county.”

They also reported the insurance business was equating so-termed “nuisance settlements” — usually produced when an entity decides that shelling out somebody to conclude a lawsuit would be much less expensive or extra convenient than battling the matter in court docket — with true misconduct by the county or its representatives.

Tim Osborne, govt director of ICRMP, reported in a phone interview that he could not elaborate on the causes that the board voted to non-renew the policy. He reported his workplace is doing work to coordinate a assembly with Canyon County officers to assessment the “documentation” of the causes the board voted to non-renew. Right after that meeting, Canyon County officials could ask for a conference with the board in open session about how to go forward, he claimed.